tyre width query

purple charlie

CCCUK Member
My C4 is running on 295/35 ZR18 Image 11inch alloys on the rear. The Michelin Pilots are cracking up from being sat for a few years. The fronts are 9.5 inch wide with 255/45 zr18 tyres.
not much choice for the rear tyres and trying to match with fronts.
I wont be doing many miles or fast track work.
my local dealer has suggested 285/35 zr 18 as an alternative and will save around £100 a tyre. the rims work out to be 280 approx, so is it ok to run the 285;s as an alternative. Rough working is the Pilots are £1100 for the set, the other option in Pirelli are £800. My main concern is living in rural areas with loads of pot holes £350 for rear replacement should it hole would be expensive.
 

Roscobbc

Moderator
I have been running 285/40/18 Toyo's on the rear of my C3 for 10 years or so. 285's in an 18" size are getting a little scarce (and correspondingly expensive) - I will be replacing them next year (as they are 'going-off' a lttle in terms of traction). My intention was to replace them with 275/40's which seem to be a more popular size, less expensive and available from more manufacturers. The difference in total tyre height between a 285 and 275 is less than half an inch and will make a very small difference in gearing/speedo accuracy and perhaps reduce rear-end ride height by 5mm (quarter inch).
There's a useful American tyre site that allows you to feed-in and compare alternative tyre sizes with the OEM fitment.
And if finances are really tight there are budget options that are perhaps a third of the price of leading brands - how good they are is another matter though -
 

Chevrolet

CCCUK Member
my local dealer has suggested 285/35 zr 18 as an alternative and will save around £100 a tyre. the rims work out to be 280 approx, so is it ok to run the 285;s as an alternative.
Yes according to this. On those 11 inch wide rear wheels minimum tyre width is 275, recommended 285 or 295, maximum 305:
 

Chevrolet

CCCUK Member
And if finances are really tight there are budget options that are perhaps a third of the price of leading brands - how good they are is another matter though
Cant believe how cheap those Acceleras are at £60.65:
I'm on my 2nd set of Acceleras on one of my daily drivers, Ian Goss at IGS American recommended them to me years ago. Ride, noise and braking seem to be just as good as the original Continentals? That's on a 140mph car that I just use for pottering about and never drive over 80mph.
 

teamzr1

Supporting vendor
Cant believe how cheap those Acceleras are at £60.65:
I'm on my 2nd set of Acceleras on one of my daily drivers, Ian Goss at IGS American recommended them to me years ago. Ride, noise and braking seem to be just as good as the original Continentals? That's on a 140mph car that I just use for pottering about and never drive over 80mph.

If looking at those specs though, they are rated mid-class as not great for wet/traction and wear
Also, only Y speed rated
 

Roscobbc

Moderator
Yes according to this. On those 11 inch wide rear wheels minimum tyre width is 275, recommended 285 or 295, maximum 305:
A 275 section tyre on an 11" rim may well be the supposed 'minimum' tyre width so is same width as rim........but isn't going to be very forgiving for the rims if you are unfortunate enough to even lightly scrape a kerb.......even the 305 is only an inch wider. I recall years ago with 15" rims there was a rule of thumb that a 50 or 60 section tyre should be as a minimum be 2 inches wider than the rim (allowing 1" sidewall additional width per side of rim)
And then you'll see something that is just plain ridiculous and really questionable in terms of any handling benefit and the likelyhood of body damage if something goes badly wrong
 

purple charlie

CCCUK Member
thanks all.
Ive now got the original salad spinner wheels for the mot now, so have more time to shop for something matching for the Image Alloys also time to polish them up!!
 

Dorsetsteve

Well-known user
Use a calculator such as this;

You can then see in real terms the difference in sidewall height etc etc. It’s a very small change. If you can get a better quality tyre for the same cost or the I would happily do that. I’d be more concerned about the design of the tyre than the aspect ratio as such at this point. Some cheaper tyres have no side wall meat that would protect that rim should you have a misjudgment parking etc and irrespective of the mileage and intended use the tyres are a literally all that connects you to the road.
 

Chevrolet

CCCUK Member
Some brands of modern low profile tyres have "rim protectors" built into the tyre. My VW daily driver has those on the original equipment 245/35/20 tyres on 8J x 20" wheels.
Then there's those aftermarket rim protectors you can get (e.g RimBlades/AlloyGators):
Best Alloy Wheel Protection | Rimblades Rim Protectors
 
Last edited:

Roscobbc

Moderator
It seems the newer the vehicle and wheel design the further the actual wheel centres protrude out past the wheel rims - so even if you avoid rubbing the tyre and metal extremities of the wheel rim against the kerb its almost a certainty that you'll scrape and damage the wheel center........and the issue will become worse in future years as tyre aspect ratios reduce and wheel diameters correspondingly increase...........car and wheel manufacturers really need to get together and design wheels with recessed centres that are 'behind' the wheel rims.......much like older vehicles with steel rims and hubcaps utilised.
 

Chevrolet

CCCUK Member
thanks all.
Ive now got the original salad spinner wheels for the mot now, so have more time to shop for something matching for the Image Alloys also time to polish them up!!
Or "salad shooters" as some people call(ed) them. Saw that new Morgan SuperSport "in the flesh" at a car show in September. The wheels on it a good imitation of C4 '84-'89 salad shooters I thought? ;)
1765128862711.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Top