Early Corvette Blue Prints

Roscobbc

Moderator
I'm reminded of my obligatory 6 months working in the companies drawing office in the mid/late 60's. As a (then) leading manufacterer of potentiometers for the aerospace, nautical and electronics industries we would produce component, mould and press tool drawings for internal applications. As a mere 'oik' in the day I would take the ink lined drawings (on tracing paper) to the huge 'light box' with it's ultra violet lamps, sandwich the drawing (any size up to A1) under a sheet of photosensitive paper to the window off the light source for a timed period, roll it through the developer tank, then peg it up on a towel rail to dry.......long before the days of inkjet and lazer printers.
 

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
I can still smell the Amon
I'm reminded of my obligatory 6 months working in the companies drawing office in the mid/late 60's. As a (then) leading manufacterer of potentiometers for the aerospace, nautical and electronics industries we would produce component, mould and press tool drawings for internal applications. As a mere 'oik' in the day I would take the ink lined drawings (on tracing paper) to the huge 'light box' with it's ultra violet lamps, sandwich the drawing (any size up to A1) under a sheet of photosensitive paper to the window off the light source for a timed period, roll it through the developer tank, then peg it up on a towel rail to dry.......long before the days of inkjet and lazer printers.
I can still smell the Ammonia even now 🤢

My stint in the drawing office lasted just 6 months and I'm very thankful for that (company went into administration) as sitting on my arse all day would not have worked for me. My time as an air conditioning & refrigeration engineer took me to places I'd have never seen otherwise. Some amazing, some scary like the mortuaries 💀and medical collages 💀💀💀💀

The drawing office consisted of me at 16 years of age and 6 other draftsmen all of which were 50+ which to me was ancient at that time. Their drafting instruments were equally aged and produced awful output. With my first weeks wages I splurged on a set of Marsmatic 700 drawing pens and that coupled to my 16 year old eyesight had the other draftsmen looking at me as though I was some kind of Demon due to the quality of my work. Within a couple of weeks they all had new ink pens 😄
 

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
If we remind ourselves that back then they did not have the design technology tools such as 3D imaging, then we can appreciate and understand more the importance of the S.O system. That said, some of the earlier design processes still cannot be improved upon, even to this day.

I'm pretty sure the story is true of a factory dog at the TVR factory that took a bite out of a clay design model of a TVR that they worked into the front grille design 🐶
 

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
Well I nearly got it right. It was a foam model and they used the bite to model the front indicators it seems

Capture.PNG

I wonder if doggy got an extra treat
 

split window coupe

Regular user
S.O. 10323 63 Harley Earl Convertible. Another variation of the special gearshift surround plate similar to the drawing you have. The panel surround surface has a grained effect and you will see that the S.O does not appear on the drawing legend. This suggests there is very possibly another copy drawing detailing this version, however, it could well be one of many that have been lost? GM Archives began transferring drawings to those awful micro- fische slides in the 70's - any of the guys remember those things from the parts departments and the like !! So many damaged destroyed or not properly marked with reference numbers - as I said previously, it is sometimes pure luck if you stumble on a link that you understand.
Note the chrome gear knob - GM Styling absolutely adored chrome finishes
 

Attachments

  • S.O 10323.jpg
    S.O 10323.jpg
    175.9 KB · Views: 2

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
Ah yes as the '63 console was left bare metal. Don't know if that was the same for '64 but from '65 they were coloured.

My Nassau Blue '66

1774292102134.jpeg
Ignore the paper bag, someone asked how clean white seats could be with regular maintenance

my '65

1774292174494.jpeg
 

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
Just found a pic of a Marina Blue '64 a mate had and yes they had painted console plates
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20210521-WA0003.jpg
    IMG-20210521-WA0003.jpg
    202.2 KB · Views: 1

split window coupe

Regular user
I am guessing that the marketing guys must have liked the look for 64 production and that remained through to 67 I believe. I also think to improve the finished look they changed the gear shift etched pattern and raised it so that it was flush with the grain effect across the console panel. They had not considered that for the Harley Earl car. Maybe what we don't stop to fully appreciate is that even though the 63 car programme was a rush job from the outset and that would be putting it very lightly, engineers and designers still had the ability to look and plan ahead.
 

split window coupe

Regular user
I will endeavour to shed a bit more light on Mr Cricket's drawings in connection with the last of the 3, relating to " Replacement Fuel Injection " emblems.
I know for a fact that the emblems were hand made sometime prior to the drawing date. This was often the case with the 63 car and it was not just connected to S.O projects and or prototypes. Often in production, the two principal plant engineers at St Louis were instrumental in authorising engineering production changes as the cars were being built. These changes were often instigated ahead of agreement with the senior engineers at Warren, such was the autonomy of Corvette at St.Louis. Alterations in such cases would be drawn up at later dates to officially record the engineer's recommendations. Hence the term ECR - Engineering Change recommendations. During the 63 production year there were almost 650 engineering changes - a staggering amount even for a new car! Perhaps this underlines and supports the rush by Chevrolet to get the 63 car into production ahead of Ford's Mustang.
So with reference to the drawing - I have been told by more than one ex GM engineer of the day that there was rumour back in mid 62, a little ahead of the start of production of the 63 Corvette Sting Ray, that such was the difficulty in supplying reliable 360hp fuelie engines from Flint, considerations were discussed about delaying the introduction of the engine option for the new car until the issues could be solved. There is no doubt that the new and larger Rochester F.I. plenum chamber was giving a lot of problems with consistent fueling and as a consequence, giving huge potential supply problems for the Flint engine plant to supply engines to the factory when production got into full swing. I have talked regularly with another senior staff member who was at St.Louis at the time, and he tells me that while he was aware of the rumour, he had no actual evidence to support it. However, he could confirm the problems the plant were having with the 360 hp power plant.
There are also documents to suggest that the European show cars were destined to have 340hp L76 engines, however, due to the insistence of Mr Duntov the cars were in fact fitted with the L84 Fuelie units. He wanted the fastest possible Corvettes to be shown and road tested, however, if the cars were to be sold, then the fuel injection units were to be removed. Such was the reliability issue.
There is only one pre production 63 Corvette that uses the emblems. GM Styling were always looking for the best look and location of emblems. Another variation of a 63 Styling buck without crossed flags taken in the Styling dome at the Tech Centre. And another of a 63 wind tunnel car showing a GT Grand Tourismo emblem on the rear deck. There could well be others. Unfortunately I have no info to share on the later mid year car emblems.
 

Attachments

  • 1963 fuel injection emblems.jpg
    1963 fuel injection emblems.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 3
  • A 63 Corvette windtunnel test buck with GT rear deck emblem.jpg
    A 63 Corvette windtunnel test buck with GT rear deck emblem.jpg
    182.5 KB · Views: 3
  • Front fender emblem.jpg
    Front fender emblem.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 3
  • factory photo 63 front emblem samples.jpg
    factory photo 63 front emblem samples.jpg
    138.4 KB · Views: 2

Mr. Cricket

Administrator
650 engineering changes! Hardly seems possible there could be that many.

Interesting to see the SWC with knock Off wheels fitted as they were pulled from sale due to porosity issues and they were to have a two 'eared' spinner not the three eared I believe?

I have a mate with a SWC who will be fascinated with this info so I'll call him now.

Fantastic stuff swc please keep it coming.

btw, a few of us are having guesses who you might be 🙂 while I still can check the member database (I leave the committee in July) I looked but you're not listed as a member searching on your website name.
 

split window coupe

Regular user
The story behind the P48 wheels has been quite inaccurately reported over the years, however, you are correct in part with your comment on porosity issues. Only recently I stumbled upon information and one particular photograph which threw me a curved ball and I confess that I had to reconsider what I actually knew.
As many may know, prior to the release of the P48 Kelsey Hayes wheel there was a dispute between KH and The Dayton Wire wheel company over copyright to the drive design of a wheel which came to a head with GM involvement as mediator. GM were not the aggressor in this dispute as has been widely suggested over the years. Both companies were large suppliers to them at the time. A legal action was posted by Dayton against Kelsey Hayes for an infringement of their gear drive design.
Coincidentally, I was actually speaking with Gary Buckles the sales Manager of Dayton Wire earlier this year about this very subject and despite his 30 plus years with the company, both he and his colleagues were completely unaware of the dispute back in 62 and had absolutely no knowledge or account of the story behind it all !
I will sign off for now and before fiction becomes fact I will let you know more on what I know
 

split window coupe

Regular user
The mystery that surrounds Kelsey Hayes and the 63 RPO P48 Aluminium knock off wheels and spinners.
On May 7 1962 Bunkie Knudsen, General Manager of Chevrolet went to the Chevrolet Engineering Centre to inspect the new Corvette aluminium wheels. Knudsen was key in all decision making on the new car. he said " it looked good ". We can be pretty sure that what he viewed was indeed the Kelsey Hayes designed P48 knock off - tooth or gear drive as we refer to it, with 3 eared spinner.
At some point, possibly prior to, although most likely after this date in May and the commencement of full line production at the St.Louis plant in the latter part of August, a law suit, for infringement of patent was initiated by the Dayton Wire Wheel Company against Kelsey Hayes. In addition, it was discovered that the first batch of wheels delivered were not holding air. Issues with porosity and non sealing rims. It appears that it is not known how far legalities extended, however, I am led to understand that Dayton Wire were awarded extended GM supply contracts. I did have a list of supposed contracts somewhere, however, it is not corroborated.
Supplies of wheels and Spinners were suspended. There were no parts department counter sales and it is not known accurately how many sets of wheels were supplied in the first batch and if any wheels were in fact returned to the manufacturer which seems highly plausible. That said, and as we know today, some sets of wheels did find their way out initially to the race teams.
Many will be familiar with a number of GM Chevrolet Design and Styling based marketing images of the 63 Corvette, those with Zora Duntov standing alongside the car for example. I think in all cases they show the complete Kelsey Hayes combo - the aluminium wheels with 3 eared spinners. No official Chevrolet photographs of 2 bar spinners? No 63 production photographs of Corvettes with P48 wheels?.................................??
Kelsey Hayes were actually quick at getting a re-designed P48 wheel re- manufactured incorporating the more tradional Rudge type splined hub adaptor. A number of sets of sample s were supplied to Chevrolet Engineering during early production. they had no cast part number and no date stamp just a " KH" rubber ink stamp on the inner face in a dark ox blood red. They still leaked ! Further reworked sets followed at a later date and these carried a Kelsey Hayes part number casting but no date stamp and they leaked. I was told by an ex GM engineer that the early sets of reworked wheels also highlighted a weakness in the splined part of the wheel itself and some were cracking.
It is said that the P48 was not officially re introduced until the early part of the 64 Corvette production and is widely thought that no P48 wheels were factory supplied throughout the 63 production year. I have no evidence or knowledge to counter those claims. I have heard of very late 63 cars with supposed factory supplied P48's but not verified.
I will leave 2 bar spinners for next time.
 
Top